Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) unveiled its final rule revising the overtime standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or the Act). The revised overtime rule will likely impact all local governments’ wage and overtime practices. We are still reviewing and analyzing the 500+ page final rule, but below are some of the most important parts of the rule.
Irrespective of budget cycles or fiscal years for individual units of local government, the new rule will take effect on December 1, 2016. This could pose a challenge for governments that have already adopted budgets for the upcoming year, but the budget calendar will not excuse non-compliance with the new rule.
As a brief background, the FLSA requires all local government employers to pay employees for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one-and-one-half their regular rates of pay, unless employees fall within a specific overtime exemption. The new rule specifically impacts what are commonly referred to as the "white collar" overtime exemptions.
There are three tests that employees working in an executive, administrative or professional capacity must meet to qualify under a "white collar" exemption: (1) be paid a fixed salary not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of work performed; (2) the salary must meet a specified minimum amount; and (3) the employee’s job duties must primarily involve executive, administrative or professional duties (as those terms are defined under the Act).
Certain groups of employees, such as elected officials and teachers, are automatically exempt from overtime. The new rule has not changed these carve outs, and those employees will remain beyond the reach of required overtime.
In the new rule, the DOL made the following changes to the "white collar" exemptions:
- Currently, the minimum salary threshold for an executive, administrative or professional employee to qualify as exempt is $455 per week. The new rule more than doubles this to $913 per week, or $47,476 annually.
- There is a separate overtime exemption by which highly compensated employees (HCEs) are exempt from overtime based on a test that gives compensation greater importance. Currently, employees paid $100,000 per year or above (in salary, commissions and nondiscretionary bonuses) are exempt so long as their weekly salary is $455 or greater, and they customarily and regularly perform at least one of the duties or responsibilities enumerated in the "white collar" exemptions test. Under the new rule the HCE compensation threshold will increase to $134,004.
- All annual commissions and nondiscretionary bonuses have been factored into the HCE salary test since 2004. The new rule, for the first time, counts nondiscretionary bonuses and commissions, along with what the rule calls "incentives," toward up to 10 percent of the required salary level of the standard "white collar" exemptions, so long as employers pay those amounts on a quarterly or more frequent basis. Incentives, as defined by the rule, are nondiscretionary forms of compensation that, similar to commissions, can be tied to employee productivity.
- Currently the FLSA does not contain any automatic updating for the relevant salary thresholds. Under the new rule, every three years the salary thresholds will adjust based on the most recent data generated through the U.S. Census.
Hypothetical examples of employees’ overtime eligibility under the new rule:
Example #1: John manages dispatching of public works employees for a large municipality. The majority of John’s job duties do not fall within those defined by the FLSA as executive, administrative or professional. However, John regularly manages a customarily recognized department of the municipality (a recognized executive job duty). John is paid an annual salary of $1,000 per week and receives a quarterly non-discretionary bonus of $25,000.
Outcome: John likely would meet the HCE exemption because his total annual compensation is $152,000; he is compensated more than $913 per week; and he regularly performs one of the duties enumerated in the "white collar" exemptions test.
Example #2: Sally works as the finance director for a small school district. Sally’s primary duty is exercising her discretion to manage the school district’s finances in a way that best enables it to perform its operations. Sally is paid at a salary of $1,500 per week and does not receive any type of bonus.
Outcome: Sally would not meet the HCE exemption because her total annual compensation is $78,000. However, Sally likely would be exempt from overtime under the administrative employee exemption because she received more than $913 in compensation per week, her primary duty is the performance of office work directly related to the general business operations of her employer, and her primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.
Notably for local governments, the new rule does not change the permitted use of compensatory time off in lieu of cash overtime payments. Unlike private sector employers, the FLSA allows local government employers, pursuant to an agreement with employees or their representatives (unions), to pay employees with comp time instead of cash for overtime hours. The rate of comp time provided must be equal to
one-and-one-half hours for each overtime hour worked (ex: if an employee works four overtime hours in one workweek, she would be entitled to six hours of comp time). There are a number of nuances to how employers can use comp time, many of them to the employer’s benefit, and those remain in place under the new rule as well.
Prior to December 1, local government employers should prepare for the new rule by doing the following:
Analyze which employees will lose their exemption under the new rule.
- Analyze which employees will lose their exemption under the new rule.
- For those employees who will lose their exemption, employers can choose among the following options or use a combination of multiple options:
- Raise salaries to at least the new exemption threshold;
- Appropriate a budget amount to pay additional overtime to newly eligible employees (or reach an agreement to give employees comp time rather than cash pay for overtime hours);
- Reduce or eliminate overtime hours by reallocating work; or
- Reduce the amount of base pay (provided that the employee still earns at least the applicable hourly minimum wage) to account for overtime for hours worked over 40 in the workweek, to hold total weekly pay constant (employers operating under a collective bargaining agreement would have to follow the applicable labor laws to change the rate of pay).
All told, the DOL estimates the final rule will extend the right to overtime pay to an estimated 4.2 million workers who are currently exempt. This is a significant expansion of the nation’s overtime laws. Local government employers should plan ahead for the impact the new rule could have on the segment of their budget appropriation line items allocated for wages and overtime pay. If you have any questions about how this applies specifically to your agency, please contact
If you have any questions concerning this Alert or Tressler’s Local Government Law Group Group, please contact:
Luke Glisan, 312.627.4097 | email@example.com
This special alert is for general information only and is not intended to provide and should not be relied upon for legal advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. The reader is advised to consult with an attorney to address any particular circumstance or fact situation. The opinions expressed in this special alert are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Tressler LLP or its clients. This announcement or some of its content may be considered advertising under the applicable rules of the Supreme Court of Illinois, the courts in New York and those in certain other states. For purposes of compliance with New York State Bar rules, our headquarters are Tressler LLP, 233 S Wacker Drive, 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL 60606, 312.627.4000. Prior results described herein do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information contained in this special alert may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. The articles are not updated subsequent to their inclusion in the special alert when published. Tressler LLP | Copyright 2016